How Startups Can Compete Against Google

by mike on February 10, 2010

Google launched its new social experiment called Buzz yesterday. It has been labeled a Twitter and Foursquare killer by some, and lame and boring by others. Most of the launch was media hype, but it got me thinking about how startups must feel when they see new product announcements by Google. Google is one of the few companies that’s constantly acquiring (59 companies) and launching new products. So, what do you do if you are a startup and Google releases a product that goes after your core business?

This sounds silly, but first try not to freak out. It’s doubtful that Google is targeting your business specifically and it’s not a zero sum game. Now, if you are Twitter or Foursquare that’s a different story. Twitter in particular is an interesting case to look at. There are low technology barriers to entry in its market, but Twitter has significant demand competitive advantages (one of the 3 sustainable according to Greenwald) in the form of customer captivity and network effects. I came across recent research that put Twitter at the 1B tweets per month level, 16X growth over the prior year, in January 2010. That’s a great head start against Buzz, but with Google’s distribution engine it’s going to be worth watching how this plays out.

In general, startups should play to their strengths so here are a few things to think about:

Be nimble. Google is a large corporation with thousands of employees across the globe. With that size comes processes, procedures and other “big company-isms.” Some would argue Google is even on Microsoft’s path to creative destruction. As a startup, you don’t have the resources (e.g. R&D, sales/marketing) and associated cost structure that Google has. You are lean and mean. You can innovate at the drop of a dime and release new code many times in a single day. You can get customer feedback early and often. You can also change direction or pivot if you need to. That’s a huge advantage in itself. Big companies have an incredibly hard time shifting direction after sinking considerable time and money into something — trust me I know, I started my career off at one.

Intense focus. Last time I checked I didn’t find many companies with as grand a plan as Google’s — search, email, smb, maps, video, shopping, blogging and mobile. It’s incredibly hard to be number one in all of your markets when you have such a broad focus. Be the opposite of Google. Focus on your core business and be the best at what you do. Hopefully, your market is big enough to build a sustainable business. Build credibility in your niche and then expand.

Be disruptive. Google is a strong company because it has disruptive roots. It’s business model was incredibly disruptive. It had great core search technology, but didn’t create a new market or category. There were plenty of other search engines before Google. If you create a disruptive technology and/or business model you can compete with anyone. Disruption changes the rules of the game. Easier said than done, but aim for it.

What would you do?

{ 0 comments }

Do you own your data stream?

by mike on February 8, 2010

TechCrunch posted an article this past weekend on the startup Blippy and how Amazon is insisting that the company stop collecting user purchase data and erase all data that was previously collected. The article got me thinking about our personal data streams, the implicit web and ownership. Many investors and technorati have previously blogged and talked about the rise of platforms that capture data based on our implicit actions on the web, so no need to rehash that here.

A question worth discussing is who owns your data stream. Wait a minute, don’t I own my tweets on Twitter, status updates on Facebook, photos on Flickr, emails on Gmail, bookmarks on Delicious and reviews on Yelp? Not necessarily and define “own”. Well, does the ownership lie with the user who generated the data, the company that captured it or someone else? If it’s the company that captured it, does the user have rights to the data and can the user share the data without the company’s permission? These are all important questions that can affect future implicit web innovation and I’m not sure we have a good answer to any of them.

In the case of Blippy, if users gave permission to collect their data wouldn’t that suffice for Amazon? Well actually no, probably not. I haven’t read Amazon’s terms of service, but I could almost guarantee data generated by users is property of the company. This is particularly true of companies with advertising based revenue models. Google’s success shows how valuable data can be. Google is actually an interesting case to take a closer look at. In their terms of service, the company claims all content created by you is your property and not the company’s. Technically, Google is licensing the content from you. So, I own the videos that I upload to YouTube and emails that I send with Gmail, but Google monetizes my content, doesn’t share the revenue and restricts access to my data or some of my data?

I don’t see a good solution to this problem any time soon. Many would argue that data ownership isn’t a problem; it’s a byproduct of the implicit web. I disagree. It is a problem and with the proliferation of mobile devices, rise of the real-time web and explosion of implicit user data the problem will be exacerbated in years to come. As a user I can accept if I don’t own my data and companies are making money from it. My issue is when the playing field is not level and incumbents create walled gardens. My vote is open and free access to ALL of my data. I may not get to own my data in the long run, but I don’t have to support companies that are not open. Let innovation happen.

{ 2 comments }

Top Questions That Don’t Get Asked When Raising Capital

January 20, 2010

Most VCs have a standard protocol for evaluating investment opportunities, but entrepreneurs vary greatly in their evaluation of VCs. Experienced entrepreneurs have been through the fund raising process before and know what “potholes” to avoid. There a few questions that entrepreneurs should ask of their potential VCs and some do, but most don’t. (Note: I [...]

Read the full article →

Is FinTech dead?

October 29, 2009

Boy has the financial services landscape changed over the past year. Collapse and utter failure are the first words that come to mind. AIG, Lehman, Merrill Lynch the list goes on and on. At the same time, a few survivors like Goldman are thriving in this environment and getting ready to payout record bonuses. What [...]

Read the full article →

Cleantech Software Opportunity

December 21, 2008

Cleantech has been one of the few bright spots in terms of venture capital investment in 2008. According to The Cleantech Group, a market research and financial services firm, Q3 brought a record-level of $2.6B invested across 158 companies located in North America, Europe, China and India. That’s a 37% increase over the same period [...]

Read the full article →

BladeLogic Interview

November 28, 2008

I had the pleasure of recently speaking with fellow Rutgers alum Dev Ittycheria. Dev is President of the $1.2B Enterprise Service Management business and a member of the executive management team at BMC Software. He was formerly CEO and co-founder of BladeLogic, a data center automation software company acquired by BMC Software for $800M earlier [...]

Read the full article →

SaaS Earnings Update

October 11, 2008

Update : I’ve reposted some of my findings in the spreadsheet below. Let’s just say Google Finance isn’t the most reliable.

How are public SaaS companies faring in this economic environment?
Here are some stats that I put together based on Q2 ‘08 earnings data from ten SaaS companies, including SalesForce.com, DealerTrack, NetSuite, Taleo, Omniture, Vocus, [...]

Read the full article →

Sequoia Capital’s Survival Advice

October 10, 2008

Sequoia Capital recently made a presentation to its portfolio companies about how to try to survive an economic downturn. Definitely worth a read.

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: depression recession)

Read the full article →

SaaS & IT Spending

September 27, 2008

Research firm Datamonitor released its annual survey of IT spending this week and predicted that 50% of organizations will be freezing their 2009 IT budgets with another 13% anticipating cuts. Given the turmoil with the nation’s economy and troubled financial markets this didn’t come as a surprise to anyone.
So, how does this affect SaaS companies [...]

Read the full article →

Virtualization Management

July 19, 2008

I’ve been thinking about Virtualization Management for a while so I thought it would be a good time for a blog post, especially since my blogging pace has steadily declined to a crawl.
Virtualization has been all the buzz these days in the enterprise. Gartner expects the number of virtual machines to grow from less [...]

Read the full article →